Tag: Delaware General Corporation Law Section 141(a)

Delaware SB 313, controversial proposed corporate law amendments, heads to Governor for signature

What’s the latest on SB 313, the proposed amendments to the Delaware General Corporation Law largely designed to address the outcome of the decision in West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. Moelis & Company? That case invalidated portions of a stockholder agreement relinquishing to a founding stockholder control over certain corporate governance matters, a decision that many practitioners viewed as inconsistent with current market practice. The proposed amendments in SB 313 would add a new subsection (18) to Section 122 of the DGCL to allow corporations to enter into the types of stockholder contracts at issue in Moelis, even if the provisions are not set forth in a certificate of incorporation.  As discussed in this PubCo post and this PubCo post, those proposed amendments have turned out to be highly contentious: a number of academics and jurists, including Delaware Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick in a seven-page letter to the Delaware State Bar Committee, raised objections to the haste and timing (prior to adjudication of an appeal by the Delaware Supreme Court) of the legislation. And Law360 reports that posts by Vice Chancellor Travis Laster (purportedly not acting as vice chancellor) questioned “S.B. 313’s terms” and contended that “[c]laims by critics that the Moelis decision put thousands of agreements at risk, the vice chancellor wrote, ‘smacks of hyperbole.’” Adding even more fuel to the fire was a letter submitted to the Delaware legislature, posted on the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, by a group of over 50 law professors in opposition to the amendments, along with these separate posts by noted academics on the HLS Forum and on the CLS Blue Sky blog, with this lonely post in favor. But the bill then “sailed through” the Delaware Senate “without debate or an opposing vote,” on to the Delaware House. (See this PubCo post.)  The bill has now passed the House and been forwarded to the Governor for signature—but not without some acrimony.

Controversial Delaware legislation breezes through Delaware Senate

Controversy notwithstanding, the proposed amendments to the Delaware General Corporation Law in Senate Bill 313 have reportedly “sailed through” the Delaware Senate and are scheduled to move to the Delaware House this week. (See, e.g.,  this article in Bloomberg.) The proposed amendments were largely designed to address the outcome of the decision in West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. Moelis & Company, which invalidated portions of a stockholder agreement relinquishing to a founding stockholder control over certain corporate governance matters, a decision that many practitioners viewed as inconsistent with current market practice.  But, as discussed in this PubCo post, those proposed amendments have turned out to be highly contentious: a number of academics and jurists, including Delaware Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick in a seven-page letter to the Delaware State Bar Committee, raised objections to the haste and timing (prior to adjudication of an appeal by the Delaware Supreme Court) of the legislation.  Adding even more fuel to the fire was a letter submitted to the Delaware legislature, posted on the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, by a group of over 50 law professors in opposition to the amendments, along with these separate posts by noted academics on the HLS Forum and on the CLS Blue Sky blog, with this lonely post in favor. (See this PubCo post.)

Chancellor McCormick, law professors weigh in on controversy over proposed DGCL amendments

Last month, this PubCo post discussed the recent controversy over proposed amendments to the Delaware General Corporation Law.  As noted in the post, the Council of the Corporation Law Section of the Delaware State Bar Association proposes amendments annually, but some of the amendments proposed this year, submitted as Senate Bill 313 to the Delaware General Assembly, have elicited a substantial amount of pushback. The controversy has revolved largely around proposed amendments designed to address the outcome of the decision in West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. Moelis & Company, which many practitioners viewed as inconsistent with current market practice.  Then, a letter on this topic, dated April 12, surfaced (hat tip to Law 360) from Delaware Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick to the Delaware State Bar Committee.  Adding even more fuel to the fire is a letter submitted to the Delaware legislature, just posted on the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, by a group of over 50 law professors in opposition to the amendments.

Surprising pushback on Delaware proposed amendments

Recently, the Council of the Corporation Law Section of the Delaware State Bar Association proposed some amendments to the Delaware General Corporation Law, as they do with some regularity.  (See this Alert from the Delaware firm, Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell.)  As the Alert indicated, some of the proposed new amendments were designed to address the effects of recent Delaware cases highlighting “that the legal requirements identified in the cases were not necessarily in line with market practice.  The Amendments are designed to bring existing law in line with such practice.” According to Law 360 (here and here), the proposed amendments have just been submitted as Senate Bill 313 to the Delaware General Assembly for its consideration and approval. There’s not usually much controversy surrounding these proposed amendments. Not so this time. This year, there has been a surprising amount of pushback on these proposed amendments—or at least on one of them.